That’s what I don’t understand: While I understand that Red Hat has been GNOME centric like forever, they also supported KDE as well, until about 2 years ago. That RHEL is based on FEDORA – a Red Hat supported project – and there is a FEDORA KDE spin, it can not be that difficult to have incorporated both GNOME and KDE in RHEL. Virtually every distro – including the major heavy hitters such as SUSE and Kubuntu and Arch Linux , with SUSE definitely playing in the “Enterprise” space – offer at least GNOME and KDE.
The actions of Red Hat within the past two years – between killing off CentOS with its vibrant community, and no longer supporting KDE – seems to be they have a death wish.
There might be one explanation: Red Hat was bought out by IBM, and possibly IBM wants to make RHEL narrowly focused to work on BIG IRON only – ie Servers and Server Farms, in which case they really do not need a GUI. Simply put IBM does not care about people who run WORKSTATIONS, that said, that would be REALLY shortsighted that most BUSINESSES, have a raft of WORKSTATIONS, that run in conjunction with those Servers. Trying to force businesses to use ONLY GNOME, when many prefer to use KDE, could force those businesses to that their business elsewhere – like SUSE, a strong competitor to RHEL. IBM could also be betting that that workstations will become a thing of the past, and that the future is in VIRTUAL COMPUTING and “CLOUD” storage, that will be based on those Servers and Server Farms.