Maybe this is a stupid question, but I want to make sure if rockylinux/rockylinux on DockerHub official. I noticed that rockylinux image is marked neither Verified Publisher nor Offical Images. And there is no link from rockylinux.org to that docker hub repo.
As per my understanding below is the official docker image from RockyLinux
https://hub.docker.com/r/rockylinux/rockylinux
1 Like
Yes, it looks like a official repo. But there is no strong evidence, like verification by DockerHub or links from rockylinux.org to that repo.
neil
December 13, 2021, 6:41pm
4
We’ve got some PRs open to add our images to the Library:
docker-library:master ← NeilHanlon:rockylinux
opened 01:29AM - 27 Oct 21 UTC
Hi all,
We'd like to add Rocky Linux into the official image library for Dock… er Hub.
Thank you for your consideration!
I messed up my previous git history and just started fresh. Apologies for the confusion. Previous PR here: https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/10983
Best,
Neil
# Checklist for Review
**NOTE:** This checklist is intended for the use of the Official Images maintainers both to track the status of your PR and to help inform you and others of where we're at. As such, please leave the "checking" of items to the repository maintainers. If there is a point below for which you would like to provide additional information or note completion, please do so by commenting on the PR. Thanks! (and thanks for staying patient with us :heart:)
- [x] associated with or contacted upstream?
- [x] does it fit into one of the common categories? ("service", "language stack", "base distribution")
- base distribution
- [ ] is it reasonably popular, or does it solve a particular use case well?
- [x] does a [documentation](https://github.com/docker-library/docs/blob/master/README.md) PR exist? (should be reviewed and merged at roughly the same time so that we don't have an empty image page on the Hub for very long)
- https://github.com/docker-library/docs/pull/2047
- [ ] official-images maintainer dockerization review for best practices and cache gotchas/improvements (ala [the official review guidelines](https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/blob/master/README.md#review-guidelines))?
- [ ] 2+ official-images maintainer dockerization review?
- [x] ~~existing official images have been considered as a base? (ie, if `foobar` needs Node.js, has `FROM node:...` instead of grabbing `node` via other means been considered?)~~
- [x] if `FROM scratch`, tarballs only exist in a single commit within the associated history?
- [x] passes current tests? any simple new tests that might be appropriate to add? (https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/tree/master/test)
docker-library:master ← NeilHanlon:master
opened 11:48PM - 29 Sep 21 UTC
Hi all,
Opening this PR while preparing our PR for the official-images reposi… tory.
Please let me know if there's anything out of place here or if otherwise there's anything you need from me or the Rocky team.
Best,
Neil
2 Likes
OK, Thank for that infomation.
neil
December 17, 2021, 4:25pm
6
We’re now up on the library! Docker Hub
4 Likes
