This thread looks like continuation of https://forums.rockylinux.org/t/i-seem-to-have-some-issues-with-my-network-when-using-the-ping-command/
Note: copy-paste is way more convenient than posting bitmap images.
We see two link-local subnets: 10.1.36.0/24 and 172.168.0.0/24.
We see that interface enp25s0f0 has address 10.1.36.59 in subnet 10.1.36.0/24
We see that interface enp202s0f1np1 has address 172.168.0.159 in subnet 172.168.0.0/24
We do not see interface ens3f1np1. Does it have no configuration? Can one see it with nmcli d s ?
If the interface ens3f1np1 were configured with address 172.168.0.59/24, then it should automatically have route to link-local subnet 172.168.0.0/24
However, as I wrote in the previous thread, then you will have two addresses (172.168.0.59 and 172.168.0.159) in same subnet 172.168.0.0/24. That requires at least policy based routing to be configured and still only one of the addresses/interfaces will be the default for all outgoing connections.
Network configuration is managed by NetworkManager.service in Rocky. (It was the default already in CentOS 7.)
You can use ip to look at current config, but changes you should do via NM. For example, with nmcli.