There are none. We have what we’ve published in the community charter.
Again, there are no shareholders. There are no shares. None have been issued, so they do not exist. The team leads make up the advisory board.
The legal mechanisms are afforded according to the filing of the B Corp.
We’re open to having independent third parties perform audits of our finances and present a report to the community. That’s something we’ll be doing.
The structure and governance is listed in the team structure and community charter. That’s what we have in place. I understand this may not be enough for some people. If you feel like this is not enough for you, I respect and appreciate your thoughts, and so in that case I would recommend you do what feels most comfortable to you.
I guess I’m not entirely clear on what you’re looking for, exactly. I think I would disagree that putting intentions into ‘legalese’ enforces some kind of ethical and transparent behavior. That’s ultimately a philosophical debate, perhaps. I suppose I would ask that people judge us by our actions. Who can’t think of a non-profit or other entity that has great sounding ‘legalese’ in place that is also astoundingly corrupt?
Ultimately, we’ve decided against 501c3 at this time. We’re open about our org structure, and we’ve communicated our intentions in the community charter. We will be doing independent third party audits of our finances and will be presenting those reports to the community. We feel those actions, along with registering the RESF as a public benefit B Corp, is the most accountable and transparent way forward. I understand some may disagree, and I respect those perspectives.